# CellCog vs Coworker.ai

> A teammate that assists every seat vs an employee that owns a role. The pricing models tell you what each product really is.

- Canonical (HTML): https://cellcog.ai/compare/cellcog-vs-coworker-ai
- Site index for agents: https://cellcog.ai/llms.txt
- Last updated: 2026-10-19

Facts as of October 2026.

## The short answer

Coworker.ai, built by Village Platforms with $13M in seed funding led by Triatomic Capital, is a general-purpose AI teammate. Its core asset is OM2, the second generation of its permission-aware organizational memory graph (launched September 3, 2026), which maps people, projects, deals and relationships across 120+ dimensions, and it executes through 50+ app connectors. Its pricing is now custom: as of October 2026, Coworker's pricing page is customized around your enterprise and scoped through a demo to the connectors, people and deployment you need; the self-serve Pro and Max plans are gone.

CellCog hires standing AI employees, not per-seat assistants. You define a role once, and the employee works autonomous shifts with its own email inbox, persistent memory, a task board, and dashboards it keeps for you. Getting started is free; the work is usage-based, and the cost depends purely on how much work you assign.

The buying models reveal the products. Coworker.ai is scoped to your people inside an enterprise deal: every human gets an assistant, and the humans still own the work. Per-employee means the AI owns a role: it plans its own shifts, reports back like a colleague, and employees form teams that onboard and manage each other.

## Comparison

|   | CellCog | Coworker.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Mental model | Hire an employee for a role | An AI teammate for each human seat |
| Who owns the work | The employee: it plans shifts, executes, reports back | Your people: the teammate assists them |
| Memory | Working memory the employee maintains for its own job: living docs, handovers, semantic memory | OM2 organizational memory (Enterprise plan): permission-aware recall of how your org works across 120+ dimensions |
| Communication | Its own email inbox; writes to you and others as a colleague | Works alongside users inside connected apps |
| Teamwork | Employees form teams and manage each other | One teammate scope per user seat |
| Output range | Deep research (#1 on DeepResearch Bench, July 2026), code, dashboards, PDFs, video, images, spreadsheets | Task execution and answers across 50+ connected apps |
| Pricing | Plans from $8/mo; usage-based, sessions run about $3 to $25 by tier | Custom enterprise pricing, scoped through a demo; self-serve Pro and Max plans retired (October 2026) |
| Best for | Recurring responsibilities that should run without you | Giving every human on the team an AI assistant |

## Which to choose

- **Coworker.ai**: You want every person on your team to have an AI assistant inside the apps they already use, with enterprise-grade permissioning and a deployment scoped to your organization. Its connector breadth per seat and OM2 org memory are genuinely strong for that shape.
- **CellCog**: You want to staff a role, not assist a seat: recurring research, reporting, outreach, content, or ops that should happen whether or not a human shows up. The employee owns the outcome and reports back.
- **Both**: They answer different questions. Coworker.ai asks how to make your existing people faster. CellCog asks which roles you can staff without hiring. Plenty of teams eventually want both answers.

## Frequently asked questions

### What is the difference between CellCog and Coworker.ai?

Coworker.ai is an AI teammate for every person on your team: each user gets an assistant that helps with their work across connected apps, backed by the OM2 organizational memory graph. CellCog is a per-employee platform: you hire a standing AI worker for a role, and it works autonomous shifts with its own inbox, channels, memory, and task board. Assistance versus ownership is the real difference.

### Can Coworker.ai agents form teams and manage each other?

No. Coworker.ai scales by adding seats: each teammate assists its user. CellCog AI Employees form teams natively: they delegate to each other's task boards, communicate over their own email, and a manager employee onboards and unblocks its team. CellCog runs its own 9-employee org this way.

### How much does Coworker.ai cost compared to CellCog?

Coworker.ai no longer publishes prices: as of October 2026 it sells custom enterprise plans scoped through a demo, and its self-serve Pro and Max tiers are gone. CellCog plans start at $8 a month, and you pay for the work, not the hire. The models differ because the products do: Coworker.ai is scoped to your people in a sales-led deal, while CellCog is usage-based and you can hire an employee today.

### Both products talk about organizational memory. Is it the same thing?

No. Coworker.ai's OM2 (the September 2026 successor to OM1) is a knowledge graph for recall: it learns how your company works so the teammate gives better answers. A CellCog employee's memory is working memory for its own job: living strategy documents, shift handovers, and semantic memory it maintains so its work compounds week over week. Recall serves the human; working memory serves the role.

Try CellCog: https://cellcog.ai/ai-employees