Skip to content
AI EmployeeSuper-AgentsAgent-to-AgentBenchmarksPricingBlog

Claude Fable 5.2 Designed 3 Working Devices

At a glanceQuick answers
What did Claude design?
A USB speakerphone, a home voice-assistant hub and a handheld virtual pet, each from a short prompt, per Anthropic.
Did the devices work?
Yes. Anthropic says the prototypes worked without any fixes to their circuitry.
Who built them?
Engineers at Diode Computers, a company with a commercial relationship with Anthropic.
Editorial illustration on a near-white ground: a speakerphone puck, a wedge-shaped voice hub and a handheld virtual pet standing on a teal four-layer circuit board, under the words Claude Fable 5.2, 3 devices and 69% PCB Gym.
Fig 0Three devices, designed by Claude, built by Diode. Made by CellCog's image agent, running GPT Image 2.5.

Anthropic says Claude Fable 5.2 designed three working electronic devices from short prompts: a USB speakerphone, a home voice-assistant hub and a handheld virtual pet. Claude wrote the specifications, laid out and routed the circuit boards, designed 3D-printable enclosures and wrote the firmware. Engineers at Diode Computers built the prototypes, which worked without any fixes to their circuitry, per Anthropic’s research post published November 9, 2026.

Claude’s thread on X passed 200,000 views within about 40 minutes of posting. Anthropic notes that it has a commercial relationship with Diode, which also built the benchmark below. The two began this work a little over a year ago, when earlier Claude models could not reliably lay out a board (Anthropic’s earlier write-up).

On this page · 6 sectionsOpen
  1. What Claude did on each device
  2. The benchmark jump
  3. How it worked through the hard parts
  4. What this does not show
  5. Where CellCog fits
  6. Sources
Key points5 · 5 min full read
  1. Three small gadgets in a row.
    Anthropic says Claude Fable 5.2 designed three working devices from short prompts: a speakerphone, a voice-assistant hub and a handheld virtual pet.
  2. A circuit board with traces and chips.
    Claude wrote the specs, laid out and routed four-layer circuit boards, designed 3D-printable cases and wrote the firmware.
  3. Two bars, one short and one tall.
    On Diode’s PCB Gym benchmark, Fable 5.2 scored 69% against 25% for Fable 5; it scored 83.5% on the public BenchCAD 2.1.
  4. A tangle turning into straight lines.
    When a layout got tangled, Claude tore it up and rerouted dozens of times, and wrote its own routing tool in about half an hour.
  5. A factory with a check mark.
    Diode built the boards straight from Claude’s files; the devices are prototypes, untested for certification or mass production.

§ 01What Claude did on each device

Each device started from a short prompt. The speakerphone prompt asked for “a puck that plugs into a computer over USB-C and includes microphones and a speaker, supporting Bluetooth with a PCB antenna.”

Step What Claude did
Specification Wrote the device spec from the prompt
Schematic Drew the schematics and chose the parts, reading datasheets
Board layout Placed components and routed copper on four-layer boards
Enclosure Modeled a 3D-printable case and checked the board fits inside
Firmware Wrote the software that runs each device
Manufacturing Ran manufacturing and parts-sourcing checks and fixed what failed
Build Diode assembled the boards and ran the firmware under Claude’s direction
Table 1What Claude did for each device (Anthropic, November 9, 2026)

Anthropic’s thread sums up the pace: “Each board was ready for manufacture in under a day.” Diode manufactured all three boards directly from Claude’s design files, without the usual rounds of back-and-forth over adjustments.

§ 02The benchmark jump

Benchmark Fable 5.2 Earlier Claude
PCB Gym (Diode, internal) 69% 25% (Fable 5)
BenchCAD 2.1 (public) 83.5% Nearly half that (Fable 5.1)
Table 2Fable 5.2 on circuit-board and CAD benchmarks (Anthropic, November 9, 2026)
PCB Gym: Fable 5.2 nearly triples Fable 5 on circuit-board layoutBar chart of Diode PCB Gym scores, Fable 5 at 25 percent and Fable 5.2 at 69 percent, with Fable 5.2 highlightedFable 5.269Fable 525PCB Gym: Fable 5.2 nearly triples Fable 5 on circuit-board layoutBar chart of Diode PCB Gym scores, Fable 5 at 25 percent and Fable 5.2 at 69 percent, with Fable 5.2 highlightedFable 5.269Fable 525
Fig 1PCB Gym: Fable 5.2 nearly triples Fable 5 on circuit-board layout

PCB Gym asks a model to place components and route connections on real board designs whose layouts have been removed. Anthropic says the biggest change from earlier models is geometric reasoning: where parts go on a board and how the copper connects them.

§ 03How it worked through the hard parts

  • Most important wires first. Fable 5.2 routed the connections that carry high-speed signals or high currents, or are sensitive to noise, before anything else, and added small zigzags so paired signals arrive at the same time.
  • Starting over when stuck. Earlier models rarely revised their own layouts. On the voice hub, Claude noted the copper was “getting too tangled to trace visually”, deleted the tracks and rerouted them dozens of times until one arrangement worked.
  • Writing its own tool. When routing long tracks one at a time in KiCad would take too much guidance, Claude wrote its own router in about half an hour; it laid each long track in roughly a second.
  • Following decisions downstream. It found the speakerphone board would only fit its case if tilted about 25 degrees during assembly, and added that step to the instructions. It worked out that a 25 mm microphone port would resonate near 3.4 kHz, “right in the voice band”, and reshaped the hub into a wedge so the ports shrank to about 10 mm and the resonance moved to about 8.9 kHz.
  • Checking for the factory. Manufacturing checks flagged six slivers of solder mask as too thin; Claude widened the openings without moving any parts, and correctly ignored a flag on a deliberate ground connection.
Animated diagram: a prompt card feeds a row of six steps labeled Spec, Schematic, Board, Case, Firmware and Factory check that light up one by one in teal, ending at a finished speakerphone that Diode builds, with a check mark labeled Works
Fig 2One short prompt, six steps by Claude, one working device built by Diode

§ 04What this does not show

  • They are prototypes. Anthropic says the devices have not been through electrical validation, antenna tuning, thermal testing or certification, and were not designed for mass production.
  • Humans built them. Claude was not connected to test equipment or to the machines that make boards; Diode engineers built and tested every device.
  • The benchmark is the partner’s. PCB Gym is Diode’s internal benchmark, and Anthropic has a commercial relationship with Diode. No independent group has repeated the results yet.
  • Prompting was light, not zero. Diode’s prompts were short directives such as “clean up the schematic” and “continue”.
  • Others are here too. Anthropic notes that OpenAI recently wrote about using its models to design a handheld device.

§ 05Where CellCog fits

Every CellCog AI employee and chat tier runs on Claude Opus 5.5 today; none moved to Fable 5.2 on release day (our Fable 5.2 release record has the specs and prices). CellCog employees do not design circuit boards. What carries over is the engineering habit this research shows: write the spec, check the work, start over when it is wrong.

§ 06Sources

Frequently asked5 questions

Q1Which model designed the devices?

Claude Fable 5.2, released November 9, 2026, during pre-release testing.

Q2What is PCB Gym?

Diode’s internal benchmark that asks a model to place components and route connections on boards whose layouts were removed. Fable 5.2 scored 69%, Fable 5 scored 25%.

Q3Did humans help?

Diode engineers built and tested the devices and gave short directives such as clean up the schematic and continue.

Q4Are these products?

No. Anthropic says they are prototypes that have not had electrical validation, thermal testing or certification.

Q5Does CellCog use Fable 5.2?

Not today. Every CellCog AI employee and chat tier runs on Claude Opus 5.5.

Published 09 November 2026 All Choosing a platform →