Skip to content
AI EmployeeSuper-AgentsAgent-to-AgentTutorialsPricingBlog

Claude Sonnet 5.5: Released Sept 28, Price, Benchmarks

At a glanceQuick answers
Is Claude Sonnet 5.5 released?
Yes. Anthropic released Claude Sonnet 5.5 on September 28, 2026, as claude-sonnet-5-5, on the Claude API, Amazon Bedrock, Google Cloud and Microsoft Foundry.
How much does Sonnet 5.5 cost?
$2 per million input tokens and $10 per million output tokens, the same as Sonnet 5, with cache reads at $0.20 and 50% off on the Batch API.
How good is it?
On Anthropic’s table, 70.6% on Terminal-Bench 4.0 (Sonnet 5: 10.3%, Opus 5.5: 66.4%) and 1844 on GDPval-AA (Opus 5.5: 1846). Anthropic says Opus 5.5 is still clearly stronger on complex, open-ended work.
Editorial data illustration on a near-white ground titled Released Sept 28: a blue price tag reading Sonnet 5 $2 / $10 and a larger orange tag reading Sonnet 5.5 $2 / $10 joined by an arrow labeled same price, above two large numbers, 70.6% Terminal-Bench 4.0 and 30%+ faster
Fig 0Same price, a much higher Terminal-Bench score. Anthropic's figures from the September 28 launch. Made by CellCog's image agent, running GPT Image 2.5.

Claude Sonnet 5.5 is out. Anthropic released it on September 28, 2026, six days after saying it would “follow in the coming weeks”. Anthropic calls it “the second model in the Claude 5.5 family” and says it “runs 30%+ faster, and costs up to 30% less for most work.” Its model page sums it up as “The best combination of speed and intelligence.”

This page opened on September 23 as a rumor tracker. It is now the release record on the same URL, with every claim from the tracker graded below.

On this page · 9 sectionsOpen
  1. What Anthropic released
  2. The benchmarks
  3. The rumors, graded
  4. What Anthropic’s rhythm said, and what happened
  5. Before you switch
  6. Where CellCog stands
  7. What we are watching for
  8. Update log
  9. Sources
Key points5 · 8 min full read
  1. A sealed envelope with a wax seal: the official word, now kept.
    Anthropic released Claude Sonnet 5.5 on September 28, 2026, at 18:03 UTC, as claude-sonnet-5-5 on the Claude API, Amazon Bedrock, Google Cloud and Microsoft Foundry. It came six days after Anthropic said it would follow Opus 5.5 in the coming weeks.
  2. A price tag hanging on a string: the Sonnet price, unchanged.
    The price did not move: $2 per million input tokens and $10 output, the same as Sonnet 5, with cache reads at $0.20. Anthropic says it needs fewer tokens for the same work and costs up to 30% less per task.
  3. A small desert fox silhouette: the codename rumor, still unconfirmed.
    On Anthropic’s table it scores 70.6% on Terminal-Bench 4.0 against Sonnet 5’s 10.3% and Opus 5.5’s 66.4%, and 1844 on GDPval-AA against Opus 5.5’s 1846. Anthropic adds that Opus 5.5 remains clearly stronger on complex, open-ended work.
  4. An hourglass with sand mid-fall: the wait, 90 days after Sonnet 5.
    The rumors mostly held on timing and missed on specs. September was right and near-Opus performance at Sonnet pricing was right; the 2M-token context window was wrong (it is 1M), and so was our own arithmetic that the price would fall 20%.
  5. A railway switch with a small locomotive at the fork: a routing decision.
    CellCog runs every Claude tier on Claude Opus 5.5 and does not route to Sonnet today. Sonnet 5.5 at the same price with a near-Opus score is now a candidate for our lighter work, and the decision will land here.

§ 01What Anthropic released

Item Value
Released September 28, 2026
Model ID claude-sonnet-5-5 (Bedrock: anthropic.claude-sonnet-5-5)
Where Claude API, Amazon Bedrock, Claude Platform on AWS, Google Cloud, Microsoft Foundry
Price $2 input, $10 output per million tokens; cache reads $0.20; Batch API 50% off
Context window 1M tokens
Max output 128K tokens (300K on the Batch API, beta)
Thinking Adaptive, default effort high
Knowledge cutoff June 2026
Table 1Claude Sonnet 5.5 at release, per Anthropic’s model page and launch post

Anthropic positions it as the faster, cheaper partner to Opus 5.5: strongest at “well-scoped everyday tasks, fixing bugs, and creating polished documents, slides, and spreadsheets.” It is also the first Sonnet launched with the cyber safeguards Anthropic uses on its top models.

§ 02The benchmarks

Benchmark Sonnet 5.5 Sonnet 5 Opus 5.5
Terminal-Bench 4.0 70.6% 10.3% 66.4%
CursorBench 4.0 55.5% 34.1% 57.8%
GDPval-AA v2.1 1844 1449 1846
Humanity’s Last Exam (with tools) 64.5% 54.9% 67.7%
OSWorld 2.1 (partial) 80.1% 57.0% 81.8%
Chartography (no tools) 61.6% 15.6% 64.4%
Table 2Anthropic’s launch table: Sonnet 5.5 against Sonnet 5 and Opus 5.5
Terminal-Bench 4.0, Anthropic's numbers, in percentBar chart of Terminal-Bench 4.0 scores from Anthropic's launch table: Sonnet 5 at 10.3, Opus 5.5 at 66.4, and Sonnet 5.5 highlighted at 70.6Sonnet 510.3Opus 5.566.4Sonnet 5.570.6Terminal-Bench 4.0, Anthropic's numbers, in percentBar chart of Terminal-Bench 4.0 scores from Anthropic's launch table: Sonnet 5 at 10.3, Opus 5.5 at 66.4, and Sonnet 5.5 highlighted at 70.6Sonnet 510.3Opus 5.566.4Sonnet 5.570.6
Fig 1Terminal-Bench 4.0, Anthropic's numbers, in percent

These are Anthropic’s numbers, run by Anthropic. Its own caveat is worth quoting in full: “Opus 5.5 remains clearly stronger at complex, open-ended work requiring sustained judgment.” Read the table as a cheaper model closing most of the gap on benchmarks, not as a Sonnet that replaces Opus.

§ 03The rumors, graded

Claim Source Verdict
Coming weeks after Opus 5.5 Anthropic, Sep 22 True: six days
Launch in September X posts, Aug 4 and Sep 4 True: September 28
Near Fable 5.1 level at Sonnet pricing X post, Sep 4 Largely true on price and benchmarks: same price, GDPval-AA 2 points below Opus 5.5, which Anthropic puts at Fable 5.1 level
2M-token context window X posts, Aug 9 and Sep 4 False: 1M tokens
Codename Fennec X posts from Aug 9 Unconfirmed: no Anthropic document names it
A 20% price cut like Opus 5.5 Our own arithmetic, Sep 23 Wrong: the price is unchanged
Table 3What the tracker logged, against what shipped
Date Event Source
Jun 30 Claude Sonnet 5 released at $2 and $10 per million tokens Anthropic
Aug 4, 09:51 Sonnet 5.5 in the final stages before release, as early as next month @Mr_Salio on X
Aug 9, 08:52 Codename Fennec, rumored 2M-token context window @Mr_Salio on X
Aug 13, 04:32 Fennec already associated with the earlier Sonnet 5 leak @vepsi__ on X
Aug 20, 13:43 Nearing release, will approach Fable 5 level @Mr_Salio on X
Sep 4, 00:22 Could land this month, near Fable 5.1 at Sonnet pricing @0x0SojalSec on X
Sep 22, 16:31 Sonnet 5.5 and Haiku 5.5 follow in the coming weeks Anthropic
Sep 23, 12:05 Already finished, waiting to be released @Mr_Salio on X
Sep 23, 14:40 Docs, release notes, pricing, OpenRouter catalog: no Sonnet 5.5 Our read
Sep 28, 18:03 Claude Sonnet 5.5 released: claude-sonnet-5-5, $2 and $10 per million tokens Anthropic
Table 4The Sonnet 5.5 chain, dated (2026, UTC)

§ 04What Anthropic’s rhythm said, and what happened

Model Released Days since previous Sonnet
Claude Sonnet 4.5 September 29, 2025 first of this run
Claude Sonnet 4.6 February 17, 2026 141
Claude Sonnet 5 June 30, 2026 133
Claude Sonnet 5.5 September 28, 2026 90
Table 5Sonnet releases and the gap since the previous Sonnet
Days between Sonnet releasesBar chart of days since the previous Sonnet: Sonnet 4.6 at 141, Sonnet 5 at 133, and Sonnet 5.5 highlighted at 90Sonnet 4.6141Sonnet 5133Sonnet 5.590Days between Sonnet releasesBar chart of days since the previous Sonnet: Sonnet 4.6 at 141, Sonnet 5 at 133, and Sonnet 5.5 highlighted at 90Sonnet 4.6141Sonnet 5133Sonnet 5.590
Fig 2Days between Sonnet releases

The fastest Sonnet turnover of this run, and the 5.5 family is filling in faster than the 4.5 family did.

Generation First Second Third
4.5 (2025) Sonnet 4.5, Sep 29 Haiku 4.5, Oct 15 (+16 days) Opus 4.5, Nov 24 (+56 days)
5.5 (2026) Opus 5.5, Sep 22 Sonnet 5.5, Sep 28 (+6 days) Haiku 5.5, coming weeks
Table 6The last .5 family rollout vs this one

§ 05Before you switch

Anthropic lists five breaking changes for code written against Sonnet 5. Thinking is turned off with between_tools rather than disabled. Forced tool use (tool_choice any or tool) returns an error. Thinking blocks are tied to the model and the conversation. On the Claude API and Google Cloud the older computer use tool is rejected. And the advisor tool refuses some older advisors. Effort levels are also recalibrated, so a setting carried over from Sonnet 5 will not behave the same.

Thinking now stays with the account that made it

One of the five changes drew most of the attention a day later. Anthropic’s release notes say thinking blocks that Sonnet 5.5 produces “work only in the account that produced them, or in an account linked to it.” When a different account sends one of those blocks back, the API drops it before the model sees it and the request still succeeds, so the model answers without that earlier reasoning. Blocks from earlier models are not affected.

Anthropic’s developer account gave the reason on September 28, 2026 at 18:36 UTC: the change is meant “to curb distillation attacks via account-switching.” A session that moves to another account mid-conversation still works; Claude rereads the session and thinks again. Without Anthropic’s thinking-binding beta header, the drop is silent, so a tool that routes one conversation across several API keys will not see an error, only a model that has lost its earlier thinking.

For teams running Sonnet 5.5 through one account, or through Claude Code, nothing changes. For anyone rotating keys across accounts in one session, the fix is to keep a conversation on one account (or on linked accounts).

§ 06Where CellCog stands

Every Claude tier in CellCog runs on Claude Opus 5.5, with the tier setting how hard it thinks (what changed); we do not route to Sonnet today. A Sonnet 5.5 two GDPval points below Opus 5.5 at half the price per token is a real candidate for lighter work, and we will test it on our own agentic runs before any switch. The result lands on this page.

§ 07What we are watching for

  • Independent scores: Artificial Analysis, Terminal-Bench’s own board, SWE-Bench.
  • Claude Haiku 5.5, which Anthropic says follows in the coming weeks.
  • How the breaking changes land in agent frameworks that force tool use.

§ 08Update log

As of September 23, 2026, 14:40 UTC: page opened. Anthropic’s statement is in the coming weeks; the rumored September window had one week left.

September 29, 2026, 14:55 UTC: added the account-bound thinking rule from Anthropic’s release notes and its developer account (thinking blocks now work only in the account that made them).

September 28, 2026, 18:15 UTC: Claude Sonnet 5.5 released at 18:03 UTC. Page flipped from tracker to release record on the same URL: spec table, Anthropic’s benchmark table, the rumor scorecard, the release-gap chart, the breaking changes and a new hero. Our Sep 23 price arithmetic was wrong and is marked so.

§ 09Sources

Frequently asked5 questions

Q1When was Claude Sonnet 5.5 released?

September 28, 2026. Anthropic’s release notes and model page date it that day, and the launch thread went out at 18:03 UTC. It came 90 days after Sonnet 5 and six days after Opus 5.5.

Q2What is the context window of Sonnet 5.5?

1M tokens, with up to 128K output tokens on the synchronous API and 300K on the Batch API under a beta header. The 2M-token rumor from August was wrong.

Q3Is Sonnet 5.5 a drop-in replacement for Sonnet 5?

Not quite. Anthropic lists five breaking changes: thinking is turned off with between_tools instead of disabled, forced tool use returns an error, thinking blocks are tied to the model, the older computer use tool is rejected on the Claude API and Google Cloud, and some advisor pairings are refused.

Q4Is Claude Haiku 5.5 out?

Not yet. Anthropic says Haiku 5.5 will join the Claude 5.5 family in the coming weeks.

Q5Does CellCog use Sonnet 5.5?

Not today. Every CellCog tier runs on Claude Opus 5.5, with the tier setting how hard it thinks. Sonnet 5.5 is now a candidate we will test on our own work.

Published 23 September 2026 Last reviewed 29 September 2026 All Choosing a platform →